‘the brain in control…under control…’: Toward a cognitive approach to the spectatorship of Not I
This paper examines the critical approaches afforded to theatre studies by developments in cognitive sciences. In particular, Samuel Beckett’s 1972 short play, Not I, is examined with the aim being to establish the psychological processes the piece invokes in spectators. Moving the focus from approaches that take for granted (or elide altogether) the role that spectators play in the production of the theatrical event, I will argue, with the help of several contemporary cognitive scientists, theorists and theatre scholars, that a meaningful understanding of Beckett’s work must be grounded in an awareness of the cognitive processes elicited by its live performance. This essay puts forward the notion that the power of Beckett’s work lies in his meticulous exploitation and subversion of the typical cognitive processes used by spectators’ when engaged with a piece of theatre. To put this in the context of both Beckett- and theatre studies in general, I will look at Theodor Adorno’s seminal essay, ‘Trying to Understand Endgame’ and its implied notions of spectatorship, before going on to offer some brief observations on the concomitant nature of cognitive and non-cognitive approaches to theatre and cultural studies.
Adorno, Theodor. Notes to Literature. Trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992. Print.
Bair, Deirdre. Samuel Beckett: A Biography. London: Cape, 1978. Print.
Baron-Cohen, Simon, Alan M. Leslie, and Uta Frith. ‘Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?’. Cognition 21.1 (1985): 37–46. Print.
Beckett, Samuel. Samuel Beckett: The Complete Dramatic Works. London: Faber and Faber, 2006. Print.
Brater, Enoch. Beyond Minimalism: Beckett’s Late Style in the Theatre. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987. Print.
Chiao, Joan Y. and Katherine D. Blizinsky. ‘Cultural Neuroscience: Bridging Cultural and Biological Sciences’. Social neuroscience: biological approaches to social psychology. Ed. Eddie Harmon-Jones and Michael Inzlicht. New York; London: Routledge, 2016. Print.
Critchley, Simon. Very Little…Almost Nothing. London: Routledge, 1997. Print.
Cohn, Ruby. Just Play: Beckett’s Theatre. Guildford: Princeton University Press, 1980. Print.
Cunningham, David. ‘Trying (Not) to Understand: Adorno and the work of Beckett’. Beckett and Philosophy. Ed. Richard Land. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002. Print.
Di Benedetto, Stephen. The provocation of the senses in contemporary theatre. New York: Routledge, 2010. Print.
Dwan, Lisa. ‘Navigating through Beckett’s landscape’. Irish Times. Irish Times 15 September 2014. Web. 18 November 2016. http://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/navigating-through-beckett-s-landscape-1.1927162
Gallagher, Shaun and Dan Zahavi. The phenomenological mind. London; New York: Routledge, 2012. Print.
Goldman, Alvin I. Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006. Print.
Gontarski, Stanley E. ‘Still at Issue after All These Years: The Beckettian Text, Printed and Performed’. Journal of Beckett Studies 24.1 (2015): pp. 104–115. Web. 03 February 2017.
Gopnik, Alison and Laura Shulz. Causal learning psychology, philosophy, and computation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. Print.
Gordon, Robert M. ‘Intentional agents like myself’. Perspectives on Imitation: Imitation, human development, and culture. Ed. Susan L. Hurley and Nick Chater. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
Heiser, Marc, Marco Iacoboni, Fumiko Maeda, Jake Marcus, and John C. Mazziotta. ‘The essential role of Broca’s area in imitation’. European Journal of Neuroscience 17.5 (2003): 1123–1128. Web. 19 November 2016.
Iacobani. Marco. ‘The Problem of Other Minds Is Not a Problem: Mirror Neurons and Intersubjectivity’. Mirror Neuron Systems. Ed. Jaime A. Pineda. New York: Humana Press, 2009. Print.
Iacoboni, Marco, Roger P. Woods, Marcel Brass, Harold Bekkering, John C. Mazziotta, Giacomo Rizzolatti. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286.5449 (1999): 2526–2528. Web. 03 January 2017.
Jackson, Philip L., Andrew N. Meltzoff, and Jean Decety. ‘Vicarious responses to pain in anterior cingulate cortex: Is empathy a multisensory issue?’ Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 4.2 (2004): 270–278. Web. 05 January 2017.
Katz, Daniel. ‘What Remains of Beckett: Evasion and History’. Beckett and Phenomenology. Ed. Ulrika Maude and Matthew Feldman. London: Continuum, 2009. Print.
Keysers, Christian, Bruno Wicker, Valeria Gazzola, Jean-Luc Anton, Leonardo Fogassi, and Vittorio Gallese. ‘A Touching Sight: SII/PV Activation during the Observation and Experience of Touch’. Neuron 42.2 (2004): 335–346. Web. 20 December 2016.
Knowlson, James. Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett. London: Bloomsbury, 1996. Print.
Lahav, Amir, Elliot Saltzman and Gottfried Schlaug. ‘Action Representation of Sound: Audiomotor Recognition Network While Listening to Newly Acquired Actions’. Journal of Neuroscience 27.2 (2007): 308-314. Web. 18 November 2016.
Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. Metaphors we live by. Chicago; London: University of Chicago Press, 2003. Print.
- Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books, 1999. Print.
McConachie, Bruce. Engaging Audiences. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2008. Print.
McMullan, Anna. Theatre on Trial: Samuel Beckett’s Later Drama. London: Routledge, 1993. Print.
McTighe, Trish. The haptic aesthetic in Samuel Beckett's drama. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Print.
Mehta, Xerxes. ‘Beckett’s Spirals’. A Companion to Samuel Beckett. Ed. Stanley E. Gontarski. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2010. Print.
Meltzoff, Andrew N. and M. Keith Moore ‘Infant intersubjectivity: Broadening the dialogue to include imitation, identity and intention’. Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny. Ed. Stein Bråten. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Print.
Nellhaus, Tobin. ‘Performance strategies, image schemas, and communication frameworks’. Performance and Cognition: Theatre studies and the cognitive turn. Oxford; New York: Routledge, 2006. Print.
Nishitani, Nobuyuki and Riitta Hari. ‘Viewing lip forms: Cortical dynamics’. Neuron 36.6 (2003): 1211–1220. Web. 18 January 2017.
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Luciano Fadiga, Leonardo Fogassi, and Vittorio Gallese. ‘From mirror neurons to imitation: Facts and speculations’. The Imitative Mind. Ed. Andrew N. Meltzoff and Wolfgang Prinz. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. Print.
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Luciano Fadiga, Vittorio Gallese, and Leonardo Fogassi. ‘Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions’. Cognitive Brain Research 3.2 (1996): 131–141. Web. 21 December 2016.
Salisbury, Laura. Samuel Beckett: Laughing matters, comic timing. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012. Print.
Shaughnessy, Nicola. ‘Imagining Otherwise: Autism, Neuroaesthetics and Contemporary Performance’. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 38.4 (2013): 321–34. Print.
Turner, Mark and Gilles Fauconnier. The Way We Think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: BasicBooks, 2002. Print.
Turner, Mark. The Literary Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. Print.
Weller, Shane. Beckett, Literature and the Ethics of Alterity. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006. Print.
- Adorno’s Notes on The Unnamable’. Journal of Beckett Studies 19.2 (2010): 179– 195. Print.
Williams, Raymond. The Long Revolution. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1965. Print.
Zunshine, Lisa ed. Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2010. Print.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Durham University Department of English Studies | Research English At Durham